Fan Art A Wife And Mother Fan Art

4.60 star(s) 11 Votes
Discussion Reviews (11)
sducon

sducon

Newbie
Jul 23, 2017
40
2,280
Bullx said:
1. (2) Collection - Daz - Stimuli Animations Converted from G3 to G8 (Unofficial) | F95zone
2. 17 Renders
3. Movavi software
Click to expand...
I see. Thanks for the feedback.

I also used one of Stimuli animation in the past, they are great.
However I had trouble with body parts aligment since the figures I used did not have the same dimensions as the ones used by Stimuli (default Genesis 8 size and shape), and I didn't find a solution to fix it. (ex: hand poking through the body of the other character).
That's why I was surprised to see how it is matching correctly in your video. Maybe because the Sophia / Sam figures you are using are close to the default Genesis 8 size / shape.
I was hopping you used some magical trick :rolleyes:
 
S

Sonny86

Active Member
Feb 25, 2021
813
760
  • Like
  • Red Heart
Reactions: ollakua, sducon and Tulrek
Lucrezia&Augusto

Lucrezia&Augusto

StefStory
Game Developer
Dec 25, 2019
1,137
3,816
  • Like
  • Red Heart
Reactions: modeek, Kobudo27, Sonny86 and 2 others
redle

redle

Active Member
Apr 12, 2017
577
950
fortuna95 said:
And do you think the templates look so much more similar? Besides, they are deliberately hidden under spoilers for people like you who always have to complain instead of ignoring them, but apparently you are interested if you look at them anyway.
Click to expand...
This is not a complaint, nor any commentary on what should or should not be spoilered.

Just pointing out that "realistic version" is really not the same as saying "AI images inside." Often AI generated images look significantly less realistic. So saying viewers are forewarned and it's their own fault for choosing to look inside the spoiler isn't particularly accurate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naughtynafz
fortuna95

fortuna95

Lezz kiss for peace!
Donor
Feb 7, 2018
3,674
18,142
redle said:
...
Click to expand...
Since it is quoted, it is about the more realistic version of the predecessor. The face in particular looks much more realistic than the previous one. If you make just a little effort, you can understand it. And as I said before: the "originals" have even less to do with the characters, so you should primarily criticise those that everyone can see immediately instead of my "hidden" ones. He basically complained about AI and the models before were also AI-made!:WeSmart:
You can see from the likes that some people like it, so why not just ignore it if you don't want to deal with the core problem? Instead, you send negativity, which is what the internet does best! Have a nice Sunday! And don't worry: I'm not going to waste any more of my time on this nagativity.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: doccop63
redle

redle

Active Member
Apr 12, 2017
577
950
fortuna95 said:
Since it is quoted, it is about the more realistic version of the predecessor. The face in particular looks much more realistic than the previous one. If you make just a little effort, you can understand it. And as I said before: the "originals" have even less to do with the characters, so you should primarily criticise those that everyone can see immediately instead of my "hidden" ones. He basically complained about AI and the models before were also AI-made!:WeSmart:
You can see from the likes that some people like it, so why not just ignore it if you don't want to deal with the core problem? Instead, you send negativity, which is what the internet does best! Have a nice Sunday! And don't worry: I'm not going to waste any more of my time on this nagativity.
Click to expand...
I did not complain about your original post at all. You implied with your response that you intentionally put your images in a spoiler and tag them so that people will know that it is AI art and can skip it or not. I was informing you that... while it may seem obvious to you that "realistic" means, "I'm posting AI art," that is not at all the only way to interpret "realistic version". It could have been actual porn grabbed from the internet (true realistic). It could have been daz. It could have been a number of other things as well (AI art being only one of many possibilities). Either way, I know I did not know it was going to be AI art before I opened the spoiler (and I continue to not be complaining that it was)

I wasn't denouncing you for how you declared it either. It was informational. If you want to inform people that you are putting AI art in a spoiler, then mention AI. If you don't want to let people know it is AI ahead of time then don't. Take offense or don't.

As for the comment that after looking at the image, the pre-spoiler information makes sense... well yeah, that defeats the purpose of pre-spoiler information (regardless of whether people agree with you or not). And not everyone chases down original posts that get replied to to decide if they want to open a spoiler or not (I know I do not). For anyone who did follow the trail to the original before opening the spoiler though, well, that would have caused them to look at AI art the same as opening your spoiler.

Once again, not saying you did anything wrong. I'm simply pointing out that it is not obvious from your post that the spoiler contains AI art (whether some people make that guess or not).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
4.60 star(s) 11 Votes