No one 'things' what?
If you mean the thing about other guys being in a game being NTR,
I've seen it explicitly said. "the only other guy that can be in a porn game is the gay friend". As for someone freaking out about a guy having sex with another woman that wasn't even an LI for the player? Saw it on the Summer Scent thread, you don't even meet the girl, it's the player's friend hooking up with a chick while he's on vacation, and you hear about it over the phone, and some nut came in screaming about NTR and calling everyone 'cucks'; would have been funny if it wasn't so painfully stupid (I did make a point of calling him an idiot).
Or that no one thinks you shouldn't even bother trying to please everyone? Anyone with any sense that creates something shoul realize that, or they will drive themselves insane.
If he was an actual Gary Stu
In my experience I have seen the Gary Stu/ Mary Sue label used far too often. It is used when someone doesn't like something, and is offended that others like it/ it isn't the way they want it to be. But because that is just a subjective personal opinion and others can simply go "well, sorry you feel that way" they instead label it a 'Mary Sue' in an attempt to state that it is
objectively bad, no argument can be made with such a narrative crime!
Of course, it isn't as effective as all that even if taken seriously, but that's not the way they see it.
On the other hand, I would argue to a large extent ALL computer games have the MC as a Mary Sue. It is intended as a player self insert, a power fantasy for the player,
that is the point. But as you also state, a requirement of a Mary Sue is the character be perfect and everyone loves him, and that is almost never the case in a game, the character can and does screw up (sometimes despite what the player does) and they invariably have enemies as well who most certainly don't love the MC.
I think the only true mass market Mary Sue I've seen is Honor Harrington. She started out fine, and the series was good, but eventually it went off the rails. I think Weber just loved the character too much and he ended up making her so perfect even her enemies thought she was amazing (and those that didn't were so one dimensionally evil that the fact that they didn't love her was a sign of how bad they were).
As a note I've seen the same idea with other statements "it is bad because of THING XYZ!", and when other people go "MEH!", they come back with "how can you not be offended!?" (again, seen it, that
was actually funny). The entire thing with certain people trying to make trans people and cross dressers 'groomers' is the same thing, an attempt to make it inherently evil instead of something where it's "who cares, it's not hurting anyone else, let them be them".
Considering an NTR freak caused the cancellation of one of my favorite games Necro Detective, I have a real hate-boner for those shitheads, usually I would be in the live and let live camp. But not today.
Both the extreme pro-NTR and extreme anti-NTR crowds are very weird.
It's probvably the 'extreme' part that is the problem, not the NTR so much (although I'm not a fan either).
My word we NEED that backview. More games need backviews. Can't go talking about Rogue's booty and not flaunt it. Need to have Jean and Laura back shots so we can compare cheeks (and drool over Laura's back muscles
).
This, I have argued for exactly this. (considered my user name, that shouldn't be a surprise)
The response was that they are unlikely to add it directly into the game as that would require another full set of clothing and piece art for each character (I hadn't realized yet just how much each character was subdivided into separate pieces).
However, they did say that they planned to add more static art, so they may (probably) include such shots like that. I asked for a gallery to be added for such shots.